Justice Sam Alito asked a lawyer representing PornHub if the site boasted essays "by the modern day equivalent of Gore Vidal and William F. Buckley Jr.?" The post Justice Alito Asks PornHub’s Lawyer If People Visit the Site for the Articles ‘Like the Old Playboy Magazine’ first appeared on Mediaite.

While considering a First Amendment case about access to explicit websites online, Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito appeared to be unfamiliar with websites such as PornHub, asking representing attorneys about the kinds of content available on such websites.

The high court was highly skeptical that the difference between false and misleading would overturn a Chicago man’s conviction, but some of the justices seemed open to allowing the opportunity.

Supreme Court justices sometimes have a say over the fate of administration policies. Read more at straitstimes.com.

The justice spoke to President-elect Donald Trump on the phone hours before Trump asked the Supreme Court to stop his sentencing.

You have essays there by the modern-day equivalent of Gore Vidal and William F. Buckley Jr.?” the jurist asked to laughter from spectators.

The adult entertainment industry asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block a Texas law requiring porn sites to verify user ages Wednesday, and the justices wanted to know more about the sites' offerings.

As the justices took up a case about age verification for online adult content, they struggled to wrap their heads around the state of the industry itself

Justice Brett Kavanaugh brought up past examples of the U.S. blocking broadcasting companies from having ties to foreign governments and brought up the government’s concerns about TikTok collecting data on U.S. users, which he said “seems like a huge concern for the future of the country.”

Donald Trump was sentenced Friday morning in New York for a criminal fraud conviction decided last May despite months of legal maneuvers aimed at forestalling the hearing and an unsuccessful, last-minute request to the Supreme Court to intervene.

Democrats want you to believe that the U.S. Supreme Court is there to do whatever Donald Trump wants. Justice Barrett proves that's not the case.

Judge Juan Merchan has signaled his intention to sentence Trump to an " unconditional discharge " -- allowing Trump to avoid prison, fines or probation -- out of respect for the principle of presidential immunity, which takes effect on Jan. 20 once Trump becomes president.