Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Due to the inclement weather in New Orleans, the court will conduct all arguments scheduled for this week by Zoom. The public may listen to the live arguments by using this link: O.A. Live Streams by Case.
the Government’s motion to stay the district court’s preliminary injunction enjoining enforcement of the CTA and the Reporting Rule is VACATED.
Aug 22, 2022 · Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana No. 2:19-CV-13773 . Before Smith, Wiener, and Southwick, Circuit Judges. Jerry E. Smith, Circuit Judge: This case involves three constitutional challenges to New Orleans’s regulation of short-term rentals (“STRs”)—the City’s term for the type of
Nov 19, 2024 · Before Jones, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Edith H. Jones, Circuit Judge: For the fourth time, Mississippi state legislators appeal a district court order compelling discovery in an eight-year-old dispute over control of the Jackson-Medgar Evers InternationalAirport . For numerous reasons that
May 30, 2024 · appeal, this court affirmed the district court’s denial of the Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss that Sheriff Castloo, Wheeler, and Judge FletchDA er filed asserting qualified immunity.
The County’s appeal raises two issues to this court: (1) whether the district court erred in finding the Organizations have standing to bring their First Amendment claim, and (2) whether the district court abused its discretion in finding the Organizations showed a substantial likelihood of success on their First Amendment claim.
Oct 20, 2024 · grants the courts of appeals “jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts of the United States.” Typically, a decision is “final” only if it “ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the cou rt to do but execute the judgment.” Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945).
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . Before Jones, Ho, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. The district court and a prior panel of this court rejected Zackey Rahimi’s facial challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) and upheld his conviction under that statute. See United States v.
Jul 5, 2024 · In doing so, we part ways with our esteemed colleagues on the Sixth Circuit. See Oklahoma v. United States, 62 F.4th 221 (6th Cir. 2023) (rejecting nondelegation challenge to HISA’s enforcement provisions). Accordingly, the district court’s is AFFIRMjudgmentED in part and REVERSED in part.
Nov 22, 2024 · pursuant to a state court judgment, Crawford must overcome the strictures of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”) of 1996. He cannot, so we affirm.